AdGuard Home vs Pi-hole comparison for 2026. Compare features, Docker setup, resource usage, and encrypted DNS support for network-wide ad blocking.
Network-wide ad blocking is one of the most popular home server projects. Block ads, trackers, and malicious domains for every device on your networkβwithout installing anything on individual devices.
Two solutions dominate this space: Pi-hole, the original self-hosted DNS sinkhole, and AdGuard Home, the newer challenger with a modern interface and built-in encrypted DNS. Which should you choose in 2026?

| Feature | AdGuard Home | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | ~4 seconds | ~5 minutes |
| Encrypted DNS | Built-in DoH/DoT/DoQ | Requires cloudflared |
| Parental Controls | Built-in | Manual blocklists |
| Safe Search | Built-in enforcement | Manual configuration |
| UI Quality | Modern, polished | Functional, detailed |
| RAM Usage | ~50-100MB | ~30-80MB |
| CPU Usage | Very Low | Very Low |
| Price | Free & Open Source | Free & Open Source |
| Per-Client Settings | Yes | Limited |
| Query Log | Detailed with filtering | Detailed |
| API | REST API | REST API |

Traditional ad blockers work in your browser. Network-wide ad blockers work at the DNS level, intercepting requests for ad domains before they reach any device.
How it works:
ads.example.com0.0.0.0 (null route)Benefits:
Limitations:

AdGuard Home was released in 2018 as a more modern alternative to Pi-hole. It's developed by AdGuard, a company known for their commercial ad-blocking products.
Native Encrypted DNS Support
AdGuard Home supports all modern encrypted DNS protocols out of the box:
This means your DNS queries are encrypted from your device to your serverβISPs and network observers can't see which domains you're resolving.
Built-in Parental Controls
No need for separate blocklists:
Per-Client Configuration
Assign different settings to different devices:
Modern Web Interface
The AdGuard Home dashboard provides:
AdGuard Home is ideal if you:
Pi-hole has been the gold standard for network ad blocking since 2014. Originally designed for Raspberry Pi, it now runs on any Linux system.
FTLDNS Engine
Pi-hole's custom DNS/DHCP server is highly optimized:
Extensive Blocklist Ecosystem
The Pi-hole community maintains thousands of blocklists:
Detailed Query Logging
Pi-hole's query log is extremely detailed:
DHCP Server
Pi-hole can replace your router's DHCP:
Pi-hole is ideal if you:
Both solutions run excellently in Docker. Here's how they compare:
version: "3"
services:
adguardhome:
image: adguard/adguardhome
container_name: adguardhome
restart: unless-stopped
ports:
- "53:53/tcp"
- "53:53/udp"
- "3000:3000/tcp" # Initial setup
- "80:80/tcp" # Web UI (after setup)
- "443:443/tcp" # HTTPS
- "853:853/tcp" # DNS-over-TLS
- "784:784/udp" # DNS-over-QUIC
volumes:
- ./adguard/work:/opt/adguardhome/work
- ./adguard/conf:/opt/adguardhome/conf
Setup time: ~4 seconds to pull and start, 2 minutes for initial configuration.
version: "3"
services:
pihole:
image: pihole/pihole:latest
container_name: pihole
restart: unless-stopped
ports:
- "53:53/tcp"
- "53:53/udp"
- "80:80/tcp"
environment:
TZ: 'America/New_York'
WEBPASSWORD: 'your-secure-password'
volumes:
- ./pihole/etc-pihole:/etc/pihole
- ./pihole/etc-dnsmasq.d:/etc/dnsmasq.d
Setup time: ~2 minutes to pull and start, 5 minutes for configuration.
Pi-hole requires additional configuration for encrypted DNS. Here's cloudflared setup:
version: "3"
services:
pihole:
# ... (same as above)
depends_on:
- cloudflared
environment:
PIHOLE_DNS_: 'cloudflared#5053'
cloudflared:
image: cloudflare/cloudflared:latest
container_name: cloudflared
restart: unless-stopped
command: proxy-dns
environment:
TUNNEL_DNS_UPSTREAM: "https://1.1.1.1/dns-query,https://1.0.0.1/dns-query"
TUNNEL_DNS_PORT: 5053
TUNNEL_DNS_ADDRESS: "0.0.0.0"
This adds complexity but works reliably.
Both solutions are extremely lightweight and perfect for home servers.
| Metric | AdGuard Home | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| RAM (idle) | 50-80MB | 30-60MB |
| RAM (active) | 80-120MB | 60-100MB |
| CPU (idle) | <1% | <1% |
| CPU (1000 q/min) | 2-3% | 2-3% |
| Disk usage | 50-100MB | 100-200MB |
Both handle typical home network loads (10,000-50,000 queries/day) without any performance concerns.
On beefier hardware like an N100 mini PC:
| Metric | AdGuard Home | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| RAM (idle) | 50-80MB | 30-60MB |
| CPU | Negligible | Negligible |
| Queries/sec capacity | 10,000+ | 10,000+ |
Either solution is massive overkill for home use on N100 hardware.
Long-term memory usage depends on:
With default settings and ~500,000 blocked domains:
The difference is negligible for any modern hardware.
Encrypted DNS prevents your ISP and network observers from seeing your DNS queries. Here's how both solutions handle it:
AdGuard Home supports encrypted DNS out of the box:
Configuration (Settings β DNS Settings β Upstream DNS):
https://dns.cloudflare.com/dns-query
tls://dns.cloudflare.com
quic://dns.cloudflare.com
As an encrypted DNS server (Settings β Encryption):
This means your devices β AdGuard Home can be encrypted too!
Pi-hole requires a helper for encrypted DNS:
Installation:
# Download cloudflared
wget https://github.com/cloudflare/cloudflared/releases/latest/download/cloudflared-linux-amd64
chmod +x cloudflared-linux-amd64
sudo mv cloudflared-linux-amd64 /usr/local/bin/cloudflared
# Create service
sudo cloudflared service install
# Configure Pi-hole to use cloudflared
# Settings β DNS β Custom upstream: 127.0.0.1#5053
It works well but requires additional setup and maintenance.
| Protocol | Port | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| DoH | 443 | Blends with HTTPS traffic | Harder to block, some corporate proxies interfere |
| DoT | 853 | Purpose-built | Easily blocked by ISPs |
| DoQ | 784 | Lower latency, modern | Less supported |
| DNSCrypt | 443/5443 | Strong encryption | Legacy, declining support |
Recommendation: DoH is the most practical for most users.
AdGuard Home provides comprehensive parental controls:
Safe Browsing
Parental Control
Safe Search Enforcement
Configuration example (per-client):
clients:
- name: "Kids iPad"
ids:
- "192.168.1.50"
filtering_enabled: true
parental_enabled: true
safebrowsing_enabled: true
safesearch_enabled: true
Pi-hole requires manual blocklist configuration:
Add parental blocklists:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/StevenBlack/hosts/master/alternates/porn/hosts
https://blocklistproject.github.io/Lists/porn.txt
Safe Search requires DNS rewrites:
# In /etc/dnsmasq.d/05-safesearch.conf
address=/www.google.com/forcesafesearch.google.com
address=/www.youtube.com/restrict.youtube.com
More work but more control over exactly what's blocked.
AdGuard Home defaults (~50,000 domains):
Pi-hole defaults (~100,000 domains):
Both support the same blocklist formats:
Popular community lists work with both:
Both provide easy whitelisting:
AdGuard Home: Query log β Click domain β Unblock
Pi-hole: Query log β Click domain β Whitelist
The process is similar, though AdGuard Home's interface is slightly more intuitive.
From community testing with default + OISD blocklist:
| Content Type | AdGuard Home | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Web ads | 95%+ | 95%+ |
| Mobile app ads | 70-80% | 70-80% |
| Trackers | 90%+ | 90%+ |
| YouTube ads | ~5% | ~5% |
| Spotify ads | ~30% | ~30% |
Neither blocks YouTube or Spotify ads effectivelyβthese are served from the same domains as content.
Many users migrate from Pi-hole to AdGuard Home for the better UI and built-in encrypted DNS. Here's how:
# Export settings
pihole -a -t
# Copy the teleporter backup
# Or manually export blocklists and whitelist
Both are excellent. The practical differences are:
For most home users in 2026, AdGuard Home is the better starting point. The built-in encrypted DNS alone is worth it, and the UI makes daily management pleasant.
Pi-hole remains the choice for power users who want maximum control and don't mind extra configuration.
Yes, but it's usually unnecessary. You could:
Configure different DNS servers for different devices/networks.
Neither inherently blocks moreβblocking effectiveness depends on your blocklists. Both support the same list formats. With identical lists, blocking is identical.
Yes, with proper configuration:
For VPN clients: Point VPN DNS to your local DNS server For VPN servers: Both can provide DNS for VPN clients WireGuard/OpenVPN: Configure DNS in VPN client settings
Both offer protection:
Partially. WARP bypasses local DNS. Options:
AdGuard Home: Add to client-specific whitelist, or use "Disable protection" button Pi-hole: Add to whitelist, or disable blocking temporarily
AdGuard Home: Focus on encryption, parental controls, and UI improvements Pi-hole v6: Major rewrite with improved UI, better performance, Docker-first approach
Network-wide ad blocking is a must-have for any home server, and both AdGuard Home and Pi-hole deliver excellent results.
Our recommendation for 2026:
New users: Start with AdGuard Home. The setup is faster, the UI is better, and encrypted DNS works out of the box.
Power users: Pi-hole offers more customization and has the larger community, but requires more setup for encrypted DNS.
Either way: You'll block 90%+ of ads and trackers on every device, improve your privacy, and potentially speed up your browsing. Both solutions are free, lightweight, and run perfectly on low-power hardware.
Try one, and if it doesn't fit your needs, migrating to the other takes less than an hour. You can't go wrong with either choice.

Builds
Complete docker-compose.yml to run Jellyfin, Nextcloud, Home Assistant, Pi-hole, Vaultwarden, Immich, Homepage, Uptime Kuma, Tailscale, and Portainer on an Intel N100 mini PC under 15W.

Use Cases
Complete Nextcloud setup guide with Docker Compose for 2026. Replace Google Drive with a self-hosted cloud on an Intel N100 mini PC. Includes Redis caching, MariaDB, and remote access via Tailscale.
Use Cases
Compare the best home server dashboards in 2026: Homepage, Homarr, and Dashy. Resource usage on Intel N100, Docker setup, and which dashboard to choose for your homelab.
Check out our build guides to get started with hardware.
View Build Guides